If you ever have the misfortune of accidentally passing the path to a directory
containing 177GB of data to the
rm -rf command, I'll start by suggesting that
you hit ctl-c. The sooner the better.
Next, assuming you have some sort of backup, you'll be staring at two monumentally large data sets, wondering exactly what was deleted from the original.
With help from dkg, I
learned somethings about
rm -rf. For one, it deletes one top level directory
at a time. So - a comparison of the top level directory listings of the
original and backup is a good place to start.
Top level directories that are entirely missing in the original are easy to restore. However, the presence of a top level directory in the original doesn't mean it was un-touched.
Next, you'll want to figure out which top level directory
rm was operating on
when you hit ctl-c. dkg discovered that
ls -UR will provide a listing in the
same order that
rm -rf uses. The -U means do not sort. Note - the unsorted
listing of the backup directory might not be the same as the unsorted listing
of the original, so
ls -UR is only really helpful on the original directory.
After selecting the first top level directory,
rm -rf seems to delete all
files in that directory first (presumably in the same order that ls -UR will
list them), then it enters the first sub directory (as returned by ls -UR) and
repeats the process.
With a careful comparison of
ls -UR on the original with the directory
listings on the backup, you should be able to pinpoint the exact sub
directories affected, allowing you to restore only the files and directories
that you deleted.
Thanks to dkg for technical and blog title suggestions.